Rule 129 - Initiation and conduct of proceedings

129. Initiation and conduct of proceedings.[1]

(1) Where the Standing Committee is satisfied that there is a prima-facie evidence to show that the supplier has not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax on the supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices, it shall refer the matter to the [2][Director General of Anti-profiteering] for a detailed investigation.

(2) The [3][Director General of Anti-profiteering] shall conduct investigation and collect evidence necessary to determine whether the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services or the benefit of input tax credit has been passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices.

(3) The [4][Director General of Anti-profiteering] shall, before initiation of the investigation, issue a notice to the interested parties containing, inter alia, information on the following, namely:-

(a) the description of the goods or services in respect of which the proceedings have been initiated;

(b) summary of the statement of facts on which the allegations are based; and

(c) the time limit allowed to the interested parties and other persons who may have information related to the proceedings for furnishing their reply.

(4) The [5][Director General of Anti-profiteering] may also issue notices to such other persons as deemed fit for a fair enquiry into the matter.

(5) The [6][Director General of Anti-profiteering] shall make available the evidence presented to it by one interested party to the other interested parties, participating in the proceedings.

(6) The [7][Director General of Anti-profiteering] shall complete the investigation within a period of [8][six] months of the receipt of the reference from the Standing Committee or with in such extended period not exceeding a further period of three months for reasons to be recorded in writing [9][as may be allowed by the Authority] and, upon completion of the investigation, furnish to the Authority, a report of its findings along with the relevant records.

 

[1] This Rule was inserted by CGST(2nd A)R, 2017 vide Notification No. 10/2017-Central Tax dt. 28-06-2017 wef 01-07-2017.

[2] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[3] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[4] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[5] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[6] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[7] Substituted for words “Directorate General of Safeguards” by Rule 2(ii) of The CGST(7th A)R, 2018 vide Notification No. 29/2018-Central Tax dt. 06-07-2018 wef 12-06-2018.

[8] Substituted for words “three” by Rule 15 of The CGST(4th A)R, 2019 Notification No. 31/2019-Central Tax dt. 28-06-2019 wef 28-06-2019.

[9] Substituted for Words “as allowed by the Standing Committee” by Rule 2(v) of The CGSTR(3rd A), 2018 vide Notification No. 14/2018-Central Tax dt. 23-03-2018 wef 23-03-2018.

GST Gyaan | https://gstgyaan.in | CA Rajesh Ritolia - 9350171263

Top